Linguistic Creativity in Heritage Speakers
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Heritage speakers on the edge : Sentence final particle usage among heritage Cantonese speakers
This thesis investigates the use of sentence final particles (SFPs) in heritage Cantonese. Heritage speakers are early or sequential bilinguals who, in adulthood, are more proficient in the dominant language of their society than in their first, “heritage” language. Heritage speakers exhibit systematic divergence from the baseline (the language they were exposed to), a number of which can be at...
متن کاملTalking Points in Linguistic Creativity
Creative linguistic devices like metaphor, simile and analogy serve two important roles in language. The first of these is to make the unfamiliar and the strange seem more familiar and understandable (Indurkhya, 1992). For instance, one might describe a burqa (a full body covering for Muslim women) as a suit of armor, as a shield against prying eyes or, depending on one’s communication goal, as...
متن کاملHeritage language and linguistic theory
This paper discusses a common reality in many cases of multilingualism: heritage speakers, or unbalanced bilinguals, simultaneous or sequential, who shifted early in childhood from one language (their heritage language) to their dominant language (the language of their speech community). To demonstrate the relevance of heritage linguistics to the study of linguistic competence more broadly defi...
متن کاملAgreement and Plural features in Heritage Arabic Speakers
31 Agreement and Plural features in Heritage Arabic Speakers Studies of heritage speakers of Spanish and Russian have reported that verbal and nominal morphology are vulnerable areas for L1 loss and incomplete acquisition. In this paper, we will report on on-going experimental research on the vulnerability of nominal and verbal agreement in Heritage Arabic speakers, since Arabic presents comple...
متن کاملHow do speakers avoid ambiguous linguistic expressions?
Three experiments assessed how speakers avoid linguistically and nonlinguistically ambiguous expressions. Speakers described target objects (a flying mammal, bat) in contexts including foil objects that caused linguistic (a baseball bat) and nonlinguistic (a larger flying mammal) ambiguity. Speakers sometimes avoided linguistic-ambiguity, and they did so equally regardless of whether they also ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics
سال: 2016
ISSN: 2397-1835
DOI: 10.5334/gjgl.90